Daily Archives: May 31, 2012

Implied Consent could be all you need for Cookie Compliance

imageWith the 26 May deadline for compliance now behind us, the latest guidance from the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has raised a few eyebrows. The requirement for explicit consent before a site can store cookies on another user’s device has been relaxed with the assumption of “implied consent” now being accepted as a valid means to comply with the law.

What does this mean? At the simplest level, a user who makes a conscious choice to visit your site could be deemed to have given their implied consent to receive cookies, removing the need for you to collect their explicit consent. For this implied consent to be sufficient a site owner still needs to ensure that their privacy policy is easily discoverable and clearly lays out the ways that cookies are used on your site. However, the ICO also warns:

Implied consent is certainly a valid form of consent but those who seek to rely on it should not see it as an easy way out or use the term as a euphemism for “doing nothing”.

That said, the likelihood of the ICO imposing financial penalties on any organisation for failing to comply with this law is, by the ICO’s own admission, close to zero. Some may read this as an invitation to do nothing, and therein lies the most absurd aspect of this unenforceable new law.

If you haven’t already, watch Dave Evans’ video below to familiarise yourself with the steps you may still need to take to stay on the right side of the law. As long as you understand how cookies are used on your site, don’t use cookies in a bad way, have a clear privacy policy, and take some basic steps to ensure that visitors know that cookies are in use and why, you should be safe.

Mind you, I’m not a lawyer so seek legal advice if in doubt. Good luck!

Further reading:

Why too much choice paralyses your business

There’s an old adage, “you can never have too much choice”. Like most old sayings it’s starting to sound absurd, but many marketers still believe that giving customers more choice is always a good thing.

The truth is very different. Too much choice can paralyse your customers, slowing or preventing their purchase. Choice often engenders fear; the fear that you’ll make the wrong choice and regret your decision. Choice injects confusion, that nagging concern that you really ought to be weighing up all the options more carefully.

Does this coffee machine really need so many options? (and what lunacy tells us people need both Freshbrew and Fresh Coffee anyway?!):

image

Does 1&1 really need to offer so many different web hosting packages that customers are left dazed, confused and longing to have a little simplicity back in their lives?

image

Another web hoster, Squarespace, gets it right. They know that customers don’t want infinite choice, just a great product presented in the simplest possible way:

image

Choice: it’s a tricky little blighter. Too little and you narrow your market appeal. Too much and you completely destroy it.

Focus on your core strengths, on what really matters to your customers. Invariably, with concerted effort, too much choice can quickly be distilled down to the essentials, leaving you to focus on giving your customers a fantastic experience with your a narrower range of products.

And that’s where business success lies; not in giving so much choice that you appeal to every Tom, Dick and Harriet, but in zeroing in on what you’re truly great at and making sure you attract the type of people who will fall in love with what you do.

%d bloggers like this: